Evaluation of the California Tax System

                                                          By Jiazhen “ Joan” Chen

The Taxation System

            The term tax serves as a firm reminder to people that they have been given personal and mandatory responsibility to divert a certain amount of their wealth—past, present, or future—to become  part of the revenue required by institutions and units of government performing public services (Brimley, Verstegen, & Garfield, 2012, p. 114).  All citizens owe taxes.  The benefits of government services are shared by all of the nation’s citizens in varying degrees,  depending on their needs. A good tax system provides that every person and every business be  required to pay some tax to government (Brimley, Verstegen, & Garfield, 2012, p. 115).  

            Because everyone pays taxes, as a matter of simple justice and fairness, a good tax system distributes the burden it creates among all its citizens in an equitable manner. The notion of equity  incorporates both horizontal and vertical dimensions. First, horizontal equity requires that those  taxpayers in similar circumstances should be treated equally. Second, vertical equity requires  that taxpayers in different circumstances should be treated according to those differences (Brimley, Verstegen, & Garfield, 2012, p. 115).

            It is necessary for education to be financed by government, given its capability of collecting resources from the private sector and  distributing them equitably among institutions in the public sector.  Historically education has been  financed largely at the local level. In the opinion of many, this fact creates one of the more difficult  problems with which educators must concern themselves—providing equitable school programs and  creating equitable tax burdens across the state within the framework of the local property tax system (Brimley, Verstegen, & Garfield, 2012, p. 116).

The Five Basic Criteria For a Good Tax System

  • Equity and Ability-to-Pay

Whether a tax system is fair depends on how it treats all individuals, particularly the rich and the  poor. If the greatest percentage of the tax burden falls on low-income individuals, then the tax is  regressive and considered unfair. Taxes are considered fair if they contain features of progressivity with the largest percentage falling on individuals with higher incomes system (Brimley, Verstegen, & Garfield, 2012, p. 117).

  • Adequacy of Yield

            Maintenance of the extensive services of government requires large amounts of tax revenue.  Therefore, it is important that taxes be applied to productive sources. There is no point in complicating the system by the addition of taxes that have little individual potential for yielding revenue  in substantial amounts (Brimley, Verstegen, & Garfield, 2012, p. 117).

  • Cost of Collection

            To the extent possible, taxes should have relatively low collection and administrative costs for  both the government and the individual. Government institutions are interested in the amount of  net revenue available to them rather than the gross amount of dollars collected (Brimley, Verstegen, & Garfield, 2012, p. 117).

  • Predictability and Stability

   Governments depend on taxes for funding; consequently, revenues that are consistent, dependable are preferred to those that change from year to year. The predictability of consistent or  stable revenue streams allow governments to forecast future income and expenditures with some  accuracy and assure that revenues will be available to meet their needs (Brimley, Verstegen, & Garfield, 2012, p. 118).

  • Difficulty to Evade

          It is a distinct violation of good taxation theory to pass  tax laws that have gaping loopholes whereby many citizens or businesses can escape paying their  share of the tax burden. Such unfair exclusions make those who contribute pay more than their  fair share of the costs of government services (Brimley, Verstegen, & Garfield, 2012, p. 115).

Different Types of Taxes

Property Tax

            A property tax is levied against the owner of real or personal property for individuals and businesses. Real property is not readily movable; it includes land, buildings, and  improvements. It is usually classified as residential, industrial, agricultural, commercial, or  unused (vacant). Personal property is movable; it consists of tangibles (such as machinery, livestock, crops, automobiles, jewelry and recreational vehicles) and intangibles (such as money,  stocks, and bonds) (Brimley, Verstegen, & Garfield, 2012, p. 130).

Income Tax

            The personal income tax is usually a progressive tax levied on the income of a person received  during the period of one year. It is the basis of the federal financial structure, but is also used to a  lesser degree by nearly all of the states as a funding source (Brimley, Verstegen, & Garfield, 2012, p. 127). Individual income is  derived from salaries, dividends, sale of assets, interest, and gains. There are both individual and  corporate income taxes (Brimley, Verstegen, & Garfield, 2012, p. 134).

Sales Tax

            A sales tax is a levy imposed on the selling price of certain goods and services. It is generally  applied at the retail level rather than on wholesale operations. If food and other necessities are  subject to a sales tax, the tax becomes regressive. The sales tax is used most often at the state  level of government although it is sometimes applied at the county and city levels. It produces  large amounts of revenue and is one of the most transparent ways to collect taxes, but its use  without exclusion of necessary goods and services tends to overburden poor families (Brimley, Verstegen, & Garfield, 2012, p. 129).

Excise Tax

An excise tax, also called a sumptuary tax, is sometimes imposed by government with the primary purpose of helping to regulate or control a certain activity or practice not deemed to be in  the public interest (Brimley, Verstegen, & Garfield, 2012, p. 134).

Severance Tax

            Severance taxes are defined by the Department of Commerce as “taxes imposed distinctively on  removal of natural products—e.g., oil, gas, other minerals, timber, fish, etc.—from land or water  and measured by value or quantity of products removed or sold.”  This tax is imposed at the  time the mineral or other product is extracted (severed) from the earth. Levies can also be made  for the privilege of removing a given commodity from the ground or from water. These levies are  sometimes called production, conservation, or mine (or mining), and occupation taxes (Brimley, Verstegen, & Garfield, 2012, p. 134).

Evaluation Table of the Tax System in California

 StableEasy to CollectEquitableAdequateEasy to Evade
Property TaxYesYesNoYesNo
Income TaxYesYesYesYesNo
Sales TaxNoYesNoYesNo
Excise TaxNoNoNoNoYes
Severance TaxNoNoYesNoYes

Highest-ranked Tax

Income tax ranks highest becauseincome is a good measure of an individual’s economic well-being or “ability” to  pay. Using income as a measure of fiscal capacity creates a fair system of tax burdens on society.  Equals—those persons with similar incomes—are taxed equally. Unequals—those persons with  different incomes—are taxed differently. As the cornerstone of the tax system, all other taxes are  assessed in relation to the impact they have on a person’s income (Brimley, Verstegen, & Garfield, 2012, p. 134).

An advantage of using income as a measure of economic well-being is  that it can be measured and taxed over a specific period of time. If it fluctuates, so does the tax  that is paid. Income is also relatively easy to track, although sometimes it can be hidden in the  form of tips, trades, or exchanges. Another advantage is that all taxes are paid out of income (Brimley, Verstegen, & Garfield, 2012, p. 134). Income  taxes provide a substantial yield, making it a key approach in funding government programs and  services (Brimley, Verstegen, & Garfield, 2012, p. 129).

Lowest-ranked Tax

            Excise tax ranks lowest because for this kind of  tax, the collection of revenue is only a secondary purpose of the tax. Thus, funding is usually  comparatively small, and there is little room for expansion or extension of the tax (Brimley, Verstegen, & Garfield, 2012, p. 134).  In general, sumptuary taxation receives little support from tax theorists. The fact that  sumptuary taxes do, in fact, produce revenue often leads to a situation in which a  governmental unit in need of funds is tacitly encouraging an activity which tax legislation sought to discourage (Brimley, Verstegen, & Garfield, 2012, p. 134).

Best Tax for Education

Property tax is the best tax for education because of its desirable traits. It operates as a direct tax. It is easily collected. It is almost impossible to avoid paying. It is highly productive. It is highly visible. It is relatively stable and can provide a reliable source of revenue.  It is regulated and controlled by local boards of education within state law (Brimley, Verstegen, & Garfield, 2012, p. 130-131).

Property taxes were the first kind of school taxes, and they still constitute almost the complete local tax revenue for schools. The states have long based their local school revenue systems on a property tax. For a  long time, the property tax seemed to be reasonably satisfactory as an education financing mechanism. The property tax at the  local level has proved to be a good and reliable source of revenue for operating schools and providing many other services of city, town, and county government (Brimley, Verstegen, & Garfield, 2012, p. 130).

Equity and Adequacy Issues

Even though the property tax has served the schools well for many years, it has always faced  some criticism. The property tax no longer represents the fair or  equitable measure of taxpaying ability that it did years ago (Brimley, Verstegen, & Garfield, 2012, p. 131). The finance problems encountered by most urban centers illustrate some of the deficiencies of the property tax.  Cities generally have higher percentages of high-cost students to educate—such as students with disabilities, low-income students and English language learners (Brimley, Verstegen, & Garfield, 2012, p. 132). Described by many as the most regressive, oppressive, and inequitable tax of  all, it has lost much of its traditional popularity as a source of revenue for schools.  Many segments of society—taxpayers,  educators, and economists—have protested both its use and particularly its extension (Brimley, Verstegen, & Garfield, 2012, p. 132).   

A single tax, regardless of its basic strengths or utility, can never be fair for all citizens of  a taxing unit. Taxation theory requires diversification with a broad tax base—such as income,  sales, and property—so that an individual’s “escape” from a particular kind of tax does not mean  complete exemption from paying a tax of any kind. Diversification of taxes is important, but  simplicity is equally necessary in any good tax system. Taxpayers cannot be expected to support intricate and complicated tax laws they cannot understand (Brimley, Verstegen, & Garfield, 2012, p. 116-117).

References

Brimley, V.R., Verstegen, D. A. & Garfield R.R. (2012). Financing education in a climate of change (12th edition). Pearson Education Inc.

Published by joanjzc

I am a doctorate student at Concordia University Irvine. I am studying Educational Leadership. I am working as a research assistant in EDD office at CUI. I was a teacher before.

Leave a comment

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started